Geben Sie Ihre Email-Adresse an, und Sie werden bei neuen Beiträgen jeweils sofort per Email informiert.
eID - 5 days ago - subscribe - 19 Aufrufe - 
3 Likes - De En Fr It
For thirty years, protecting minors online wasn't an issue. Suddenly, it's needed—on an international scale oO
o For 30 years, no one gave age verification a second thought
o Next up: eID and age verification
o With eID, a lot of people can claim their age
o The government doesn’t see it—but Google & Co. do
o You’re identified by your age and real name
o Identification takes place on social media
o From there, Google recognizes you on other websites
More videos: https://blog.muinar.ch
Videos on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/muinar/videos
Videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@mikes.7675/videos
100% surveillance-free websites https://muinar.ch
Telegram discussion group: https://t.me/blog_muinar
Muinar Newsletter: https://muinar.ch/know-how
Muinar on Xhttps://x.com/ChMuinar
High-quality dietary supplements: https://nem-shop.ch
Ultimate T-shirts: https://stampacitta.com/
Weiterführende Videos:
Ihr Kommentar:
You draft a law, put it out for public comment, and specifically ask for the desired outcome. In other words, you need statements on the protection of minors, because we haven’t had that before—not for thirty years. And it works: Many cantons, political parties, associations, and NGOs are actually speaking out. “We need protection for minors. We are calling today for the protection of minors.” The legislature is happy to accommodate this: It now has the support of the people, who want such provisions.
Age verification serves the agenda. Just in time for the e-ID vote, calls for youth protection went up. For example, a petition called for more youth protection on “anti-social” media. Until now, there was no such thing as youth protection on the internet. There couldn’t be any, because the internet is, after all, anonymous. If internet users are anonymous, then you don’t know their age either. For thirty years, no one knew their age, and now suddenly they do—that’s strange. Why is this being pushed now? With e-ID just around the corner, which allows you to prove you’re old enough without revealing your birthday—which, admittedly, is very elegant.
But why push this now, after no one cared about it for thirty years? They’ve even introduced a new law, the KomPG—the Federal Act on Communication Platforms and Search Engines. The KomPG entered the consultation phase in October 2025. The law, as it’s worded, sounds perfectly fine:
“The Federal Council aims to strengthen users’ rights in the digital sphere and require very large communication platforms and search engines to ensure greater fairness and transparency.” A new law is intended to enshrine key rules for services such as Facebook, X, TikTok, and Google. The Federal Council decided this at its meeting on October 29, 2025. Interested parties may submit comments on the draft until February 16, 2026.'
However, participants in the consultation are specifically asked to comment on the protection of minors! ‘Those invited to participate in the consultation are invited to submit comments on the draft by February 16, 2026. They are also asked to comment on specific questions regarding the protection of minors and the reporting procedure.’
So, a law is drafted, put out for public consultation, and specific questions are asked about the desired outcome. In other words: We need statements on the protection of minors, because we haven’t had that before—not for thirty years. And it’s working: Many cantons, political parties, associations, and NGOs are actually saying, “We need the protection of minors. We are calling for the protection of minors today.” The legislature is happy to accommodate this. It now has the support of the people, who want such provisions.
What will change on the very large social media platforms? Because that’s what this is about—the very large ones. There, you can scan a QR code with the e-ID app. The social media platform will ask for more than just, “Are you sixteen yet?” It will ask for your full date of birth, like Telegram, for example. “So your friends know when you’re partying,” they say. But now it’s no longer voluntary. You simply have to enter your real date of birth. And what does that mean for social media platforms?
Your full name and real date of birth represent massive added value, because this data is officially certified! This data is worth far more on the market. This brings the “anti-social” media platforms higher revenue from data trading. And for Google, this is worth significantly more when purchasing it—if it hasn’t already managed to get its hands on this hot data itself.
The “anti-social” media platforms will be the place of identification—the place where they will inevitably identify visitors by their full name and real date of birth.
From there, clear trails lead to the millions upon millions of websites that don’t require e-ID registration—which make up the vast majority—but where Google and Co. have placed their tools and cookies. So Google sees who is leaving social media with officially verified information and happily tracks the clearly identified trails across the internet!
The entire internet? No, a few web designers don’t have cookies or Google tools on their websites. They’d certainly be happy to take on your project. And besides:
Who needs “anti-social media” then?
This is another post on the topic “If no one else says it, I’ll just say it myself.” You can watch more videos anytime at blog.muinar.ch—free from surveillance and commercial breaks. You can also like, subscribe to, and comment on the video at blog.muinar.ch without feeding any algorithm. If you need a website that doesn’t ship your visitor data to Silicon Valley, check out muinar.ch. If you found the video interesting, please share it, like it on blog.muinar.ch, or subscribe so you’ll be notified when the next video is posted. That’s it for today. Thanks for watching, and see you next time.